Evolution or Creation?

    A choice - Your Choice, actually

    do they support one another? Read on to see...

    There has been a considerable amount written over many years about the case "for" evolution, but only more recently promoting the case "for" creation.

    The term "Creation Science" has been ridiculed by a very vocal number of aetheist scientists, who would have you believe that all scientists are united in both how all life supposedly evolved out of nothing, and mutations and changes then produced increases in the information stored in these self-developing cells. They also insist that that no 'real' scientist could possibly subscribe to the idea that there could have been an intelligent creator.

    This is actually "Misinformation", and we have started to place material here which will allow you to make your own mind up whether or not aetheists are right, or if God could have created the heavens and the earth.

    You see the big problem is that an extremely one-sided case has until now been presented because of a lack of co-ordinated scientific material that can be used to question the concept of "particles to people" in a form that some scientific minded people would be prepared to accept.

    It might be useful to place several paragraphs selected out of various "Creation Science" publications, because of the way in which they cut straight to the heart of the matter. Here are several from a book written by Ken Ham, and from another by one of his colleagues.

    Who is Ken Ham? you ask.

    Straight away you have identified a good worldly question - one when we try to use secular expertise, titles and "know-how" in establishing whether or not someone is actually worth listening to.

    Kenneth A. Ham has a Bachelor degree in Applied Science, and a Diploma in Education. That means he has been to school, then studied at University, and gone on to study how to teach. He also has considerable practical classroom teaching experience with High School and adult students.

    We shall also draw upon the expertise of Dr Jonathan D Safarti B.Sc (Hons in Chemistry), Ph.D. (Physical Chemistry, specialising in Vibrational Spectroscopy), also Dr Carl Weiland M.B., B.S., and Dr. Don Batten, B.Sc. (Hons - majoring in Horticultural Science), Ph.D. (a similar field). Dr Batten has travelled over the world for the Australian C.S.I.R.O as an scientific expert helping other countries.

    Material from these authors' pens (keyboards) is included here under the appropriate international copyright approval for quotations, known in Australia as "Fair Dealing". Links to associated websites will be placed in due course.

    Most people have the wrong idea about what the creation/evolution question involves. Instead of perceiving the real issue, they have been deceived into believing that evolution is a Science.

    Evolution is actually not a science at all. It is a belief system about the past. We do not have access to the past. We only have the present. All the fossils, all the living animals and plants, our planet, the universe - everything exists in the present. We cannot directly test the past using the scientific method (which involves repeating things and watching them happen) since all evidence that we have is in the present.

    It is astonishing in this so-called "scientific age" that so few people know what science really is, or how it works. Many think of scientists as unbiassed people in white laboratory coats objectively searching for the truth.

    However, scientists come in two basic forms, male and female, and they are just like you and me. They have beliefs and biases. A bias determines what you do with the evidence, especially the way in which you decide that certain evidence is more relevant or important than other evidence.

    Scientists are NOT objective truth-seekers; they are not neutral.
    ............
    Please right click on either image above to see it larger

     

    This section of the website is not included to "push any religious barrow", but merely to provide some resource material so that you can make informed decisions on what to believe, and perhaps more importantly, what NOT to believe.

    It will be expanded as time permits, and will contain references and links for you to look up.

    All illustrations by Steve Cardno; reproduced under fair dealing from the publications from which they were pulled.

    last updated 4th August 2002